Equality of Citizens and Non-Citizens in the EU Essay -- Social Welfar

IntroductionThe territory of the European Union (EU) hosts nigh 500 jillion people. Are they all equal in their rights? decidedly not. One of judicial dividing lines lies amidst the nationals of EU Member States (Citizen) and third- farming nationals (TCNs) whose citizenship belongs to a non-EU country. Nationality and then does matter in EU law it confers different statuses. The paper compares the both separate sound regimes that are applicable to EU citizens and TCNs respectively. Due to the narrow down scope of this essay, the analytical focus adopted here is under cardinal major limitations. First, judicial migrants coming from outside the EU constitute several(prenominal)(prenominal) different categories (for instance, stinting migration, family reunion or migration of students, pupils, trainees, and volunteers) in EU law, which is regular more mingled because of privileged TCNs who gain their status from special arrangements between their own country and the EU, fur thermore Schengen visa requirements mean additional categorisation along a different dimension. The essay deals only with non-privileged long residents (LTRs) as defined by the Council Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (LTRs Directive) . Second, both EU citizens and LTRs rights comprise several dimensions (for example, access to employment, family reunification or loving grants) barely this study is mainly focused on their entitlements to egg on and reside inside the territory of the EU. Third, the main concern of this paper is restrictions to the antecedently mentioned rights of both categories of persons. Fourth, the family members uncomplete of Citizens nor TCNs are not part of the main trunk of this analysis. Subsequently, the e... ...and citizenship tests in several countries as a new way of selecting immigrants. bump away from viewing integration as a positive social measure and towards preponderantly v iewing it as a repressive in-migration measure female genital organ be noticed. Works Cited1.Anton-Mathew-Morgan. In R.2.Aust. In R.3.Byers-Chesterman. In R.4.Cassese. In R.5.Crawford-Olleson. In R.6.Evans. In R.7.Fitzmaurice. In R.8.Francas presentation.9.Freestone-Salman. In R.10.http//www.nationsencyclopedia.com/United-Nations/Law-of-the-Sea.html11.http//www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm12.Openheim. In R.13.Rio Declaration14.Sands. In R.15.Slide on The nine pillars of the common heritage of mankind.16.Slides on History17.Slides on Climate Change18.Tuerk. In R.19.UN Charter20.UNHCR. In R. Equality of Citizens and Non-Citizens in the EU Essay -- favorable WelfarIntroductionThe territory of the European Union (EU) hosts roughly 500 million people. Are they all equal in their rights? Definitely not. One of legal dividing lines lies between the nationals of EU Member States (Citizen) and third-country nationals (TCNs) w hose citizenship belongs to a non-EU country. Nationality therefore does matter in EU law it confers different statuses. The paper compares the two separate legal regimes that are applicable to EU citizens and TCNs respectively. Due to the narrow scope of this essay, the analytical focus adopted here is under four major limitations. First, legal migrants coming from outside the EU constitute several different categories (for instance, economic migration, family reunion or migration of students, pupils, trainees, and volunteers) in EU law, which is even more complex because of privileged TCNs who gain their status from special arrangements between their own country and the EU, furthermore Schengen visa requirements mean additional classification along a different dimension. The essay deals only with non-privileged long-term residents (LTRs) as defined by the Council Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (LTRs Directive) . S econd, both EU citizens and LTRs rights comprise several dimensions (for example, access to employment, family reunification or social grants) but this study is mainly focused on their entitlements to move and reside within the territory of the EU. Third, the main concern of this paper is restrictions to the previously mentioned rights of both categories of persons. Fourth, the family members neither of Citizens nor TCNs are not part of the main body of this analysis. Subsequently, the e... ...and citizenship tests in several countries as a new way of selecting immigrants. Shift away from viewing integration as a positive social measure and towards predominantly viewing it as a repressive immigration measure can be noticed. Works Cited1.Anton-Mathew-Morgan. In R.2.Aust. In R.3.Byers-Chesterman. In R.4.Cassese. In R.5.Crawford-Olleson. In R.6.Evans. In R.7.Fitzmaurice. In R.8.Francas presentation.9.Freestone-Salman. In R.10.http//www.nationsencyclopedia.com/United-Nations/Law-of-the -Sea.html11.http//www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm12.Openheim. In R.13.Rio Declaration14.Sands. In R.15.Slide on The nine pillars of the common heritage of mankind.16.Slides on History17.Slides on Climate Change18.Tuerk. In R.19.UN Charter20.UNHCR. In R.