How Wwii Effected the Indian Independence Movement

Rebecca Martinez 18 November 2012 Professor Sutherland ANTH 4002 initiation contend IIs Impact on the Indian Independence relocation The success of the Indian Independence effect is, by some scholars, largely attributed to efforts of Mahatma Gandhi. As stated by BBC, Gandhi was the draw of the Indian nationalist motility against British rule, and is widely considered the father of his clownish (India. wikia. com). However, this revolutionary movement, a dream that had been growing since the mid nineteenth century, was the selection of a wide spectrum of Indian policy-making organizations, philosophies, and rebellions.For example, the events and latermath of the Second sphere War posed an stinting crisis and semipolitical confrontation that transformed patriotism and colonialism for many colonies, including India. Even less credit is given to the various global events that shaped the movement, as well as those involved. Regardless of the divisions in Indian nationalist eff orts, both in assert and against violence, they all contained unrivaled general intention freedom from Britain.Were historians correct in their proposition that Indias freedom was largely attributed to Gandhis peaceful anti- struggle efforts, or were Gandhis strategies at long last uneffective? If proven effective, should Indias rapid progress in independence during demesne War II be seen as affected near by Gandhi, or were bigger actors involved? I believe that the source of Indias successes in their 100-year struggle for independence should non be correlated with one man.Rather, by paying close attention to key events, powerful political players, critical economic changes, and motivating political factors from around the globe during this period, historians result gain a better understanding of how Indias independence movement was rapidly accelerated, and ultimately successful, during the period surrounding human being War II. When state of contend initially broke out in September of 1939, Britains grasp on India was as fierce and stubborn as ever (Bose and Jalal, 130).Although coitus leadership in India implored Great Britain to define their war aim beforehand declaring Indias support, viceroy Linlithgow avowed the British Indian Empire a belligerent against the axis powers without consulting prominent Indian leaders (Bose and Jalal, 130). Once it became consume that the British were unconcerned with Indian nationalist aspirations, the intact Congress leadership resigned from the local government councils in protest. However, this protest was not simply an reverse to Britains decision.Many Indian nationalists believed that Britains fight for democracy and freedom in the Second World War contradicted their rule over a sight of colonies (wiki. com). Mahatma Gandhi, for example, termed Britains war to save democracy as hypocrisy since it was denying democratic rights and unmarried liberties to Indians (wiki. com). patronage the atroci ties faced by Indians under British rule, many Indians back up the British war effort and fought with the Allied Forces.In hopes that the British would leave India later the Second World War, the Indian depicted object Congress cooperated with the British war efforts, making the British Indian phalanx was one of the largest volunteer forces during the war (India. wikia. com). However, when it became clear the Britain had no intention of relenting their hold India after the war, Gandhi called for a unyielding but passive resistance to foster a peaceful dialog with the British government.Ultimately, Gandhi and the Congress Party proposed a Quit India suit, which declared that if the British did not accede to the demands for Indian independence, a massive Civil noncompliance would be launched (Bose and Jalal, 133). However, once Britain arrested the top Congress Party leaders, the Quit India Movement fizzed out entirely before it even had a chance to cockle steam.That being s financial aid, although Mahatma Gandhis initial civil disobedience movements were driving forces that ultimately shaped the cultural, religious, and political hotshot of a Indian diverse nation, they did not have a significant impact on Indian independence following the Second World War. Although historys spotlight for Indian nationalist ideas during this clock is set on Gandhi, the fight for freedom during World War II saw the rise of two independence movements. many leaders of the revolutionary Indian independence movement collaborated with the Axis powers to swage the British Raj.Although largely ignored by historians, the Azad Hind movement, in collaboration with Japanese forces, successfully piddled the Indian National Army in 1942. Indian armed services alliances with Axis nations alike included the Legion Freies Indien in Nazi Germany and the Battaglione Azad Hindoustan in Fascist Italy (wiki. com). Although Adolf Hitler saw Indians as racially inferior and had no inte rest in Indias future, he believed that if India gained its independence it could change state a valuable ally of the Axis powers and sponsor it gain dominance in the Indian Ocean area (Kumar).As a result, Germany and Japan actively provided support to Indian independence movement leaders. The Indian Nation Army, led by Subhash Chandra Bose, was based on the principle that An enemys enemy is a friend (India. wikia. com). Bose also formed what came to be known as the Azad Hind Government, with Indian prisoners of war and Indian expatriates in South-East Asia, with the help of the Japanese (Bose and Jalal, 134). Its aim was to bother India as a fighting force that would build on habitual resentment to inspire revolts among Indian soldiers to defeat the Raj (Bose and Jalal, 134).However, due to poor mail and supplies from the Japanese and lack of support and training, the Indian National Army and entire Azad Hind ultimately failed. Although defeated, Boses initiative gave hope to the Indian familiar and turned the support and loyalty of the native soldiers of the British Indian Forces from the acme to the Indian National Army soldiers. In doing so, the British Army, whose ultimate goal was to replace the loyalty of Indian soldiers to the crown, was replaced by the Indian National Army (Bose and Jalal, 134).Bose also succeeded in developing a larger participation and unity in the Indian community, one that crossed religious and gender boundaries, than Mahatma Gandhis Quit India movement. In his book The Indian Struggle, Bose described his first clashing with Gandhi in 1921, there was a deplorable lack of clarity in the plan which the Mahatma had formulated and that he himself had no clear idea of the straight stages of the campaign which would bring India to her cherished goal of freedom (Kumar).However, although Boses efforts did aid Indias independence movement, it did not create an impact large plentiful for historians to declare its actions as the ma in source of Indias accelerated independence. The around effective factor in Indian independence during World War II, therefore, could not have been the result of Indian nationalist efforts. It was British anchor minister Clement Atlee who, when granting independence to India, said that Gandhis non-violence movement had contiguous to zero effect on the British.In corroboration, Chief Justice P. B. Chakrabarty of the Kolkata High Court, give a manner the following in a letter addressed to the publisher of Ramesh Chandra Majumdars book A History of Bengal, You have fulfilled a shocking task by persuading Dr. Majumdar to write this history of Bengal and publishing it In the forgo of the book Dr. Majumdar has written that he could not accept the thesis that Indian independence was brought about solely, or predominantly by the non-violent civil disobedience movement of Gandhi.When I was the acting Governor, Lord Atlee, who had given us independence by withdrawing the British rule from India, spent two days in the Governors palace at Calcutta during his tour of India. At that time I had a prolonged discussion with him regarding the real factors that had led the British to quit India. My direct question to him was that since Gandhis Quit India movement had tapered off quite some time ago and in 1947 no such new compelling situation had arisen that would necessitate a hasty British departure, why did they have to leave?In his reply Atlee cited some(prenominal) reasons, the principal among them being the erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. Toward the end of our discussion I asked Atlee what was the extent of Gandhis influence upon the British decision to quit India. Hearing this question, Atlees lips became twisted in a biting smile as he slowly chewed out the word, m-i-n-i-m-a-l (Kumar).In reality, the political confrontations and negotiations among Indian nationalists and the British were immensely influenced by an atmosphere of deepening economic crisis. In the effect of World War II, Britains economy was undo to such an extent that they were no longer able to financially assign their military forces, making Great Britain incapable of containing the incessant freedom movements in their colonies. Therefore, due to its collapsed economy, Great Britain would have left India much later than they did after World War II, regardless of Gandhi, Bose, or any nationalist leader.The most powerful character in Indias independence, therefore, would evidently be Adolf Hitler. Despite his selfish reasons for war, Hitler inadvertently created the perfect economic atmosphere needed for the Indian Independence Movement to take flight. Had Hitler not begun World War II, Indias independence, with only nationalist determination as a driving force, would most probably have taken much longer than it did. In the aftermath of World War II , India had increased its political, economic and military influence, which paved the way for its independence from Great Britain in 1947.Although the main factor in Britains retreat in India was its economic turmoil, India would not have been able to create or sustain a healthy economy, government, or military without the help of key nationalist leaders. For example, previous tensions between Indian castes were eased by Gandhi, who launched the Haijan movement, a campaign to improve the lives of the untouchables, whom he named Harijans, the children of God. Gandhi also influenced Indias rash political ideology. According to Jim Yardley, Gandhi is given full credit for Indias political identity as a tolerant, secular democracy. Likewise, Indian military designer was also set by Bose in his creation of the Indian National Army. Bose also succeeded in uniting various religious entities in India. For example, when he first three of Boses officers to be tried were a Hindu, a Muslim, a nd a Sikh, Indians of all three religions became united against the British in a national movement against the Indian National Army officers trial (india. wikia. com). chauvinistic efforts, specifically Mahatma Gandhi, may have not been the leading force in Indias independence in 1947, but it did make independence easier. British historians P.J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins described the hopeless situation of the British in India as follows, By the end of war, there was a loss of purpose at the really center of the imperial system. The gentlemanly administrators who managed the Raj no longer had the heart to cram new moves against increasing odds, not least because after 1939 the majority of the Indian Civil Service were themselves Indian. In 1945 the new Viceroy, Wavell, commented on the weakness and weariness of the importance of the instrument still our disposal in the shape of the British element in the Indian Civil Service.The town had been lost to opponents of the Raj the countr yside had slipped beyond control. Widespread discontent in the army was followed in 1946 by a mutiny in the navy. It was then Wavell, the unfortunate messenger, reported to London that India had become ungovernable which finally led to the independence of India (Kumar). Furthermore, although the Indian Independence Movement was greatly hastened by Britains economic crisis posed during the aftermath of World War II, Indias identity would not be the same without the influential works of Indian nationalists. Works CitedBose, Sugata & Jalal, Ayesha. 2011, Modern South Asia History, Culture semipolitical Economy, Third Edition. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York. http//india. wikia. com/wiki/Indian_Independence_Movement http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/India_in_World_War_II Kumar, Susmit. 2012. Hitler, NOT Gandhi, Should Be Given identification for the Independence of India in 1947, Online Available at http//www. susmitkumar. net/index. php? option=com_content& suck u p=article&id=100&Itemid=86 Yardley, Jim. 2010, Obama Invokes Gandhi, Whose Ideal Eludes India. New York Times. 6, Nov.